More on hand

This model was placed into an excel file. The rounding
errors were eliminated. Here are the new values.
x=.681
y=.751
EV=126.92
EV-b=76.92
-------------------
Our hero should use the R/R row strategy .681
part of the time. On a river situation he would
randomize. This being a flop situation he does
better by raising his stronger draws.
Hero should raise all in with JhTh, AhKh, AhQh,
and AhJh. Also a small portion of the QhJh hands
to bring his using R/R row to .681 of the time.
The call column EV was 128.88 and the fold column
EV was 126.64.
===============================
The hero's range of hands is expanded to 20. They
now include 77, 99(3), AhKh, AhQh, AhJh, KhQh, QhJh,
JhTh, AhTh, Ah8h, Ah6h, Ah5h, Ah4h, Ah3h, Ah2h, KhJh,
KhTh, and QhTh. This should closely resemble a set
of hands by a real player.
Ran the calculations through an Excel file. Now the
hero's proper frequency for playing row R/R is is .261.
Opener calling frequency is .775. The EV for the game
is 78.1. Again subtract 50 from the EV if you wish to
back it up to the flop decision point.
The semi-bluffing frequency was dropped to about a
quarter of the time.
Amazing this .775 calling frequency is higher than
S/(S+b), where S is the size of the pot(150 in this
case) and b is the size of the bet(200). S/(S+b)
was the optimal calling frequency in river cases
where the cards have already determined the winner.
Against unknown and aggressive players opener should
call higher than S/(S+b) part of the time. As [i]p[/i]
appoaches 1, opener should never call. Against passive
players who rarely bluff the best calling frequency
is zero.

--------------------

hero....\____ opener
______\	call	fold
R/R	57.22	150
R/C	85.47	52.67

x=.261
y=.775
EV=78.1
EV-b=27.1

Decided to delay posting charts until I find an easier way to post them